BBS

Why do so many people complain about the scar? I mean i dont use it, but its very outclassed by the Tar. The Tar has the same range and the same damage. But the Tar has a significantly faster rate of fire, and it holds 30 bullets per mag not 20 like the scar. But yeah the Tar does have a lot more recoil, which is probably why you think the scar is the new mp40.

Your completely right about the MP40 people on the leaderboards. All of them have the mp40 as their top weapon. Im proud to say that the mp40 is only my 10th weapon And i never even used the mp40. Those kills were just from picking them up. That shows how many other people use the mp40.

Callsigns were added into modern warfare 2 for one reason. To make the game feel/i] like there was more too it, to make the player feel like they were doing more and unlocking more. All to help make it seem like the player was actually accomplishing something over the ridiculous amount of game time it takes to reach level 70. As I said before, Callsigns only serve to dillute, complicate, and convolute the process of Ranking up. By throwing all these titles and emblems in your face it detracts and distracts from the multiplayer experience, in much the same was that multiplayer achievements do. The One and ONLY thing that could be considered not a game ruiner in modern warfare 2 is the concept, the idea of multiple weapon attachments. Treyarch will have to tweak that idea a lot in order to avoid all the stupid things it was used for in modern warfare 2, but they can, and probably will. Thats the Only thing from modern warfare 2 that should even be considered in Black Ops. You didn't answer my question about TI's... But anyways, callsign's are fun, they may make you seem like your accomplishing something, but isent that a good thing? It can't hurt to add something like callsign's (Except for the fact that someone has to made them.) TA has confirmed customizable characters in multiplayer, i suppose you oppose that, dont you?

Well then they should not include all that gayness simply because it made the whole multiplayer and ranking up experience convoluted, and complicated. Removing tactical insert won't stop anyone from boosting, although they should still not include them. 95% of modern warfare 2 players all have the same callsign anyway. So, like has been stated previously, just save time and headache's by not including anything from modern warfare 2. How will people boost without TI's? And come on, admit it alot of amazing things were added in mw2 that should be included in Black ops, such as callsigns.

Well to fix boosting, they could just not include tac inserts. Then people would just have to boost in cage match, but that really wont effect you. Trust me, they wont decide to not include titles, emblems, and camos just because of boosters. That like saying there shouldn't be any attachments because people will just boost for them.

Gewehr w/ aperture... Stopping power and dead silence

In MW2 all the guns are good though, its not like there's one that just stands out from all the others in every single way like the mp40 did. And your wrong when you say the mp40 has less mobility and slower ADS ect... but i really dont feel like bringing up the stats on that. And yes, there is a delay between when you press the shoot button and when the gun really shoots

The ABN guy isent the real bleach, or the bleach character i should say. http://callofdutyzombies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=331

[brains] - For Knowing that those guns are all the same caliber. However I don't understand the Mp40 "Problem" I have a ridiculous amount of game time, and I hae never had a problem with the Mp40 in any way at all. Is it common in normal mode? I almost exclusively play Harcore Search and Destroy because its awesome, and like I said, I haven't had any problems with the Mp40. The BAR is THE Prime example of a Perfectly Balanced weapon by the way, Powerful and accurate, but if you don't know how to control the recoil, then you won't get a lot of kills with it. And it isn't really that difficult, but that is part of the reason people say the guns are "too hard to use" when they should be saying "Im not good at this game". EDIT: Actually, pretty much every weapon is balanced very well in World at War. Okay lets compare the BAR and the MP40. Bar does a little bit more damage, but that wont even matter in most situations because they are both 3 shot kills at most range's wo/ stopping power. Okay, now lets talk about how the mp40 is better then the BAR. MP40 has better mobility (5% better), Faster ADS time, Better hipfire, better magazine size (more then 3 times bigger with duel mags) faster ROF (160 rpm faster), ALOT less idle sway, overall slightly less recoil per bullet, faster reload time, less delay between when you press the shoot button and when the gun actually shoots, faster center speed (TBH i dont even know what that is)... But hey, the BAR does have slightly more range EDIT: Scratch that part about the mp40 being a 3 shot at most ranges wo/ stopping power, its a 2 shot at most range wo/ stopping power, at long range its 3 shots, but put some stopping power you got yourself a 2 shot at even longer range and a 1 shot head shot :D

Thanks, but i meant to have it so you could only pick one option, hence "what do you hate MOST about mw2." I did this because i knew that most people would have problems with all the things listed. But if you think that the new way suits the poll better thats fine, no biggie. about your Mp40 post, i agree, but its like that in real life, the mp40 was very powerfull, and guns were harder to use, unlike in mw2 where you get super powered pistols lol [brains] Well if you want to go for realism, how bout this. The springfield, BAR, M1 garand, and browning all fire the same caliber bullet in real life. Do they all have the same damage in game? No. Game developers go for fun over realism any day of the week. I can give so many other examples of the guns in game that are not realistic. If a multiplayer was realistic, that would just be flat out terrible.

I actually noticed new ones too. One match on der riese and there were like 4 lines i've never heard before. One was "Takeo shut your mouth"... Forgot who said it though. Another one was when someone got a ppsh from a mystery box, and one of the characters said "I used that gun to murder my ex wife!" Im pretty sure those were new, but they dont seem very significant to your peter story.

Thanks, but i meant to have it so you could only pick one option, hence "what do you hate MOST about mw2." I did this because i knew that most people would have problems with all the things listed. But if you think that the new way suits the poll better thats fine, no biggie.

I dont have a problem with all of the things listed... and by campers i meant people that hide in corners, i dont have any problem with people that just stay on top of buildings ect. However, i completely have a problem with noob tubes. Just because something is powerful in real life doesn't mean it should be that good in the game. People dont hate noob tubes just because of the fact that they are grenade launchers, people hate them because they are overpowered. i just think if a weaon is so good, why do people hate it? why dont they use it? they obviously only hate it because it others are skillful with it and get good kills but they cant so they call it 'nooby' which i find sad, i just want to play and have fun, but i get distracted by people saying to me over mics and on txt: "you F***ing noob go **** your mum i want you to die you noob go leave cod and never come back!" and normally for just winning, ive was called a noob by a guy called 'AjaX' i think, and he told me to stop using nooby weapons, so i used the starting pistol without a scilencer on cod 4 and i was still given abuse by him and others for winning,so i told them to stop playing if they are so sad they cant handle being lv 55 10th prest and being beaten by a lv 3 (as i was then) player and if they are that terrible at cod they shouldn't bad mouth other players (they must of been using that 10th pres glitch because they were terrible at the game) This is exactly what happened with world at war. The MP40 is undeniably overpowered. People hate getting killed by it since its too good, so many people just use it themselves. I still refuse to use it. But thats a major problem with w@w, if the weapons aren't balanced you will get very little variety in gun selection from players.

The "transmission 7" you found is just a part of transmission 6. Like beta said up there.

I said i dont have a problem with all of the things listed... and by campers i meant people that hide in corners, i dont have any problem with people that just stay on top of buildings ect. However, i completely have a problem with noob tubes. Just because something is powerful in real life doesn't mean it should be that good in the game. People dont hate noob tubes just because of the fact that they are grenade launchers, people hate them because they are overpowered.

This one looks pretty sweet too. [brains]

I think that the more action packed campaign the better. I didn't really like the w@w or the cod4 campaign because it was almost completely "Go to this point then your troops will follow you" over and over again, which is just boring.

From the looks of it there will only be 4 guns in the whole game:/ The part that i found most exciting about the whole trailer was the fact the the stock on the spas wont be folded out.

Debating whether i should watch it live or if i should watch the video.

No so fast. . . I have been the host many times, and had "wanted(as in the movie)-bullets" chase me around a corner, up some stairs and then around another corner. Its the result of infinity wards built-in-lag, which was designed to diminish the very minor host advantage. Yeah, but the host is even more able to shoot bullets around corners. Without IW having the system that tries to even out lag the host would just be a complete Juggernaut compared to others.

Its even better when they say UR MOTHER

Im sure all the new maps were made way before the whole IW vs. activison fiasco started. Besides only one map designer has left so far.

The bullets follow you around corners thing, is just host advantage just most of the time. And for the underpowered snipers, i dont really think that they are underpowered, we get so many perks to beef up our snipers its not even funny.

Not if you use the right headset. Turtle Beach works wonders. Turtle Beach Works wonders. . . In World at War. You could have the best headset ever made and everything would still sound the same, Its all just. . . noise. The sound in modern warfare 2 sucks. Zieghail, I challenge you to name 1 think you like about modern warfare 2, cause you sure seem to hate everything about the game from what i've seen.

Rangers. Duh.