Zieghail

@ Qwerl Chill out Kid. I am also willing to bet you also know nothing about "Real Warfare" If you did, you wouldn't even be thinking about Joining. I agree that my reply was a little confrontational, but Your ranting did nothing to help your cause, ranting like that only makes you look ignorant, especially when you don't have all the facts, and yet you claim to.

Interesting. This presents the question: Will you play as a Russian? That would be (for lack of a better term) EPIC! Playing as a member of a Russian Special Forces team. This wouldn't necessarily mean you would fight against Americans, the entire Cold War was a giant battlefield. Russia took part inderectly, or directly, in as many secret missions as, if not more then, America. This could be really cool. And Reznov is pretty BA so it would be sweet if they brought him back some how. Treyarch also said they had ex Russian Special forces advising them along side members of the SOG. I assumed they would be there to advise enemy tactics, but you know what assuming does. . . Also, the exact time period Still hasn't been confirmed, just the fact that it spans a long period of time during the Cold War. . . So you still never know what could happen. Maybe it really is Reznov

It seems you do not understand the concept of the term noob. How can you compare "Good" and "Ridiculously-easy-to-use"? NOOD-Tubes, for instance, are named as such for the fact that they require no skill. Other weapons, in fact just about every weapon in modern warfare 2, may also be considered noob weapons because they were all Literally designed BY infinity ward for ease of use, to cater to the casual player, and in turn, be taken advantage of by the morally devoid player. Honestly, How much skill does it take to run around with a grenade launcher? Or better yet, as is the case in both modern warfare games, Launch a grenade from spawn to spawn at the beginning of every Hardcore Search Round??? Just about Zero. If you disagree then take a look at youtube, at the 6 & 7 year olds showing people exactly where to launch their grenades. Whether a weapon is created for ease of use, or not, It is to blame largely on the People. The People who play the game and have no respect for other players or the game itself. The people who just want to get kills and win as easily, and cheaply as possible. The People who forsake their gaming morals, for a simple statistic. Noobs.

No it´s 68X79'L or 7,62X39 If Thats the case, It may be just a regular old ammo crate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.62x39mm In fact, it most definitely IS just an ammo crate.

I don't see the resemblance. . .

Just saying, the Game is still 6 months from release. It probably didn't look that great because its not a High Definition Trailer. The OXM feature said that Black Ops' Graphics were Unbelievable.

I bet your not a camper. . . Last I checked, hiding in/around a corner with a noob-tube is not defending anything, and I highly doubt thats what grenade launchers were invented for. . . I find it absolutely hilarious that your talking about "Real Warfare". In fact, here's a military field manual on the m203. I bet they don't train the soldiers to use it the way you do. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... p1.htm#1-1 Sure there are campers in everygame, but just admit that there have never been so many as there are in modern warfare 2.

Its all pretty interesting stuff eh? I use to read all about it. I'm a bit of a history buff, and even though these are consiracies and theories, they had an impact on a lot of things. And who can say its all completely false? Nobody. I don't know about Zombies in space and stuff. :D

While it is true that every game will inevitably be exploited in every way possible by people who forsake their gaming morals for a win or two, the fact remains that it is more prevalent in modern warfare 2 than in any other game. This is usually caused by people do not respect the game for what it was designed to be. However, in modern warfare 2's case it is very clear, and has been stated by infinity ward themselves, that the game was designed to cater to those types of players. It was literally created for "noobs".

I play World at War all the time on a satellite connection, and I have never experienced a situation where the host was "a complete Juggernaut". I agree that the host does have an advantage, but not enough for infinity ward to create their built-in lag, creating lag for everyone and their mother.

No so fast. . . I have been the host many times, and had "wanted(as in the movie)-bullets" chase me around a corner, up some stairs and then around another corner. Its the result of infinity wards built-in-lag, which was designed to diminish the very minor host advantage.

Most Definitely. Its the best solution to your question. If you prestige on modern warfare 2 you get to waste another 2 days of game time trying to get to level 70. Not worth it.

There won't be a patch, It is infinity ward after all. . . So true, Although I would say more than 50%. Considering they literally built the game so noobs could win. Its also just the way infinity ward designs maps. Strike is horrible, vacant is horrible, bloc is horrible, shipment is extra horrible, As will these new maps be Horrible.

I see, I haven't been following those guys as much. Evidently I should.

Agreed I apologize in advance. . .but AZN Letters? Where did they come from?

Most Definitely. Not to disrespect any branch of the military if course, but Marines are the real Hardcore mode.

I accept. . . :? . . . . err. Well, no. Umm. . . I GOT IT! For Serious though: I like the concept, the Idea, of multiple weapon attachments. It was a lot of fun to use the Super V with an ACOG and a Silencer, BUT(This parts for you) it still needs a LOT of work. Treyarch will improve upon it or leave it out completely. Then all the fanboys will come running and screaming "Treyarch copied our precious infinity ward, and because they made something BETTER, they suck" --- Fanboy logic. Also, you should note, that I do not hate modern warfare 2. These are simply factual things, (and there are a lot of them) that are wrong and broken with modern warfare 2.

A stab in the dark almost Literally ^ Could be something. I suppose you are correct. There is the gathering of sorts next week with Treyarch to give a more detailed preview of the game. Might have to wait until then. Well then, lets hurry up and Wait!

If you check out the tab it should appropriately fill you in. But in short, its about Call of Duty: the best game ever made! for serious, thats the title. . Its a form of Viral Marketing for Call of Duty: Black Ops, Similar to ilovebees.com for Halo 3 or theressomethinginthesea.com for Bioshock 2. Both the Site GKNOVA6.com and the Game, developed by Treyarch. Its very mysterious and full of conspiracies and clues. Whether its about the Black Ops campaign or zombies or both has yet to be discovered.

I hate to try and revive an old thread, BUT: Everything about this game ruins objective based gameplay. Every single gametype plays out like team deathmatch. Even search and destroy, modern suckfest has turned it into team deathmatch with one life. And this has happened not just because of Nukes, but most other killstreaks, and just about every new perk. Everything about this game ruined objective based games.

If modern warfare 2 were half the game World at War is, you wouldn't have to add them as a friend, because they could compare stats with you while in matchmaking. Prestiging in modern warfare 2 is horrible, the unlocks are badly paced, and it takes way to long to prestige legitimately. 11 days of game time for 10th level 65 in World at War compared to 14 days of game time for 4th level 70 in modern warfare 2. I have almost 30 days of game time in World at War. In modern warfare 2? 14, still. modern warfare 2 = FAIL

Not if you use the right headset. Turtle Beach works wonders. Turtle Beach Works wonders. . . In World at War. In modern warfare 1 and 2 You could have the best headset ever made and everything would still sound the same, Its all just. . . noise. The sound in modern warfare sucks.

Ermmm......Who the hell told you that? Ditto ^ If thats true I'll be sad. Treyarch would fix everything of course, and it might be a decent enough game to play again BUT, Treyarch should not have to bail out infinity ward because they're a crappy developer. They need to focus on Black Ops. Oh and the maps are crap, typical crappy infinity ward maps with absolutely no possible strategy. Its just a bunch of crap dropped randomly on the ground. Every game mode plays like team deathmatch because no one cares about the objective when they can camp for a killstreak. A complete waste of dollars.

ALL OF THEM! Every map is AMAZING to play Hardcore Search and Destroy. There are so many possible strategies on each map, especially Seelow and Outskirts. The strategic exception being Dome of course, but it can still make one pretty intense search game.

I did the same, although I wasted a little more than 2 days of my life on that ridiculous excuse for a game. I've noticed no less than 25-30,000 Online. At least until 1 or 2 A.M. Really? So not being able to invite your friend to your squad mid-game, and in turn having to back out to pick up another player is "Light years ahead". Sure sounds like it. How can you say modern warfare 2 plays perfectly but World at War does not? It sounds like you need to check your connection. The lag/connectivity issue is on the player, or the host. It can in no logical way, be pinned on World at War. Unlike modern warfare 2 and its built in lag.