Zieghail

No, Its the Very Same Person, not just a look-a-like with the same name. Black Ops is sequel-ish to World at War, which is why its already been confirmed By Mark Lamia to be the same Reznov. Why is it, there are Hundreds of Assumptions about Zombies, but when something is ACTUALLY Confirmed by The Head of Treyarch, people just ignore it.

. . . Halo 3 Forge Mode? That would be awesome, and not just for zombies.

True, Maybe the M-40 from the Trailer starts out with a Scope, the rest you have to earn. I've read there is also a Scope with Higher magnification that will probably be unlockable as well. I would also like to point out that I accidentally voted for the wrong thing, I misread the poll as "what do you use". :oops: Don't ask me how, but there should be one less vote for Hardscoping and one more vote for Quickscoping as the Noobiest.

Its not about being "mad" at noob-tubes, if you don't understand then your probably a noob-tuber.

Agreed. I also hope you have to earn the Scope for the Snipers like in World at War. I honestly use a Bolt Action Rifle without out a Scope quite Often.

Agreed. [brains] World at War is much more intense than modern warfare 1, or 2. Especially Hardcore Search and Destroy. Search and Destroy is ruined in modern warfare 2, and as long as Search and Destroy in Black Ops plays at least similarly to Search and Destroy in World at War, I'll be happy.

Seriously? NO MARATHON!. It completely Ruins the Pace of the Game. Why would you want a perk that lets you sprint indefinately? Its ridiculous! Its one of the main problems in Search and Destroy, with marathon you can sprint to the enemy spawn within 15 seconds on any map in the game. And there is absolutely no need for TWO perks that make you move faster. No Hardcore Ricochet thats for sure, and more or less nothing from modern warfare 2, except for two attachments. They better re-name that perk though. Oh and :lol:

Agreed. Its hilarious that people call The Normal, Intended method and style, not to mention more realistic tactic noobish. Quick Scoping is cheap. No-Scoping is tricky, but thats because I use only Bolt Action. On a Sort-of side note: I REALLY Hope Treyarch Doesn't let you put Less Powerful Sights like ACOG's on Sniper Rifle's. If you can do that in Black Ops I will Literally Cry. Its so stupid.

This might be a long one. . . I apologize in advance, but major clarification is needed. I understand your concerns, but you are worrying needlessly. . . 880cloud088: "Is it just me or with every new info on Black ops it seems to get worse and worse. First the campaign which seemed good(nice gritty graphics like W@W) but then the multiplayer trailer came and the graphics looked exactly like MW2's." Actually, the graphical improvement is astounding. Watch the Black Ops Trailer, then watch a modern warfare 2 trailer. The graphical Difference is UNBELIEVABLE! Really, just Try it for yourself. I felt the same way before I did. And not only can you see the graphical difference, you can really see that the gameplay and gunplay is different as well. Although one reason it looks similar at first glance is because the gore is turned off. 880cloud088: "Crossbow is a 1 hit kill and a 3kills treak remote control car the blows up... A camera thats gonna help campers and crappy social feature." Would you expect to get shot with by an Explosive Bolt and live? There's enough explosive on military crossbow bolts like that to destroy a lightly armored vehicle. Look it up. And besides, did you see the way he switched to it? How slow it was when he switched? Slow like an Rpg or Bazooka or Flame Thrower. Thats the category the Crossbow Falls in. You have two shots and thats it, like a Rocket. And it will probably take up a perk slot like the Bazooka From World at War. While the Camera may help Campers, it has tons of other strategic options, just use your imagination. Treyarch Knows how to Balance weapons, and don't go complaining about the Mp-40, because in World at War, if a player wants to, but only if they have the SKILL(Something required in World at War), they can be that powerful with ANY WEAPON in the game. 880cloud088: "When did CoD a hardcore military shooter become Twitter with guns? Sure a Smiley face red dot and customizable call signs might be nice but its not CoD." When modern warfare 2 was released, but it looks like Treyarch is running with the customization. Which is a good thing. 880cloud088: "Also something that I will never forget is when Treyarch said they want to make matchmaking as fast as possible I got pretty let down by how naive they were. They also said dedicated servers would not help. We all know Treyarch pays them to say that. The whole Host system is a horrible idea but cheaper for Activi$ion. The host always gets more kills and god forbid he leave we all get to wait 30 secs" Really? I HIGHLY Doubt the Developers at Treyarch are getting paid more to not let you pick the map. Its just a simple fact, Dedicated servers don't work that great on consoles. The matchmaking system in World at War was GREAT. I Played on a 700kb satellite connection for 3 years, and NEVER had a problem with the host in World at War. So I don't know what your problem is. 880cloud088: "Ill admit MW2 doesnt lag" Hmm. . . What game have you been playing? Because modern warfare 2 has built in lag, LITERALLY. How? infinity ward took to heart all the people complaining about some sort of "Host Advantage", and the modern warfare 2 engine give every player a little bit of latency to try and balance out the "Host Advantage", EPIC Games did the same thing with Gears of War 2. 880cloud088: "And the prestige edition. WOW a remote control car $70 more then the hardened." Go look at Radio Shack for an RC Car with the Specs that this one has, AND a Live Camera and Mic, you'll find that they run upwards of $200. 880cloud088: "Everything I hear and see makes the game look more like Modern Warfail 2." Like I said, I understand your Worries, but they aren't necessary. Why? Because Treyarch is Using a DIFFERENT ENGINE. Treyarch is using a "Heavily Upgraded" version of the World at War engine, not the modern warfare 2 engine like all the fanboys are saying. So Heavily Updated, that "Not one line of Code, has been left untouched". Those are the words of Mark Lamia. That means the Gameplay itself literally Has to be more similar to World at War. The Engine IS the Game. A different Engine means no built in lag, different Host Migration, different matchmaking, different everything. Even If Treyarch didn't change anything, a lot of the problems would be fixed simply because of the different engine.

I use Tactical for Melee, I hate clicking the thumbstick to Stab people. I guess after 7 years of playing Halo I just can't use any other button for Melee-ing people. I also use tactical because when I play I can get a bit intense, so I grip my controller tightly, without tactical I'm constantly Knifing the Air and Knifing on Accident.

Thats interesting. Oh well.

The Groom Lake Facility, Groom Lake Being the whole base, of which Area-51 is just a small part, was built in 1941.

You should have gotten a Code for the Flight Suit, And nothing Else. The Rest of the Stuff Is a Collectors Edition Bonus, not a Pre-Order Bonus Check the Receipt if you have it, they like to print the Codes on the Receipt. And if you didn't get one you probably can just call and tell them you didn't get your pre-order bonus or whatever, Don't freak out about it though, its just an Avatar Outfit.

Exactly, I had thought that so apparent that I was responing with a little sarcasm by keeping in the same line of thought as the Original Post. And even thought I doubt that will happen, It would be Awesome. I personally would trade half the guns in Black Ops for a Thompson.

Dual Attachments. Although It wasn't perfect by any means. Especially the Name. If that perk is still called "bling" in Black Ops, I'm going to be pretty angry. Like Really angry.

LOL! THE GAMESTOP GUY SAID IT! ITS TRUTH! Why is this site now populated with people who Jump to conclusions so Readily?

LOL The Mp-40? Anyway. How Can you be Certain that Juggernaught will Return? They Said the Maps have been Re-Created for Black Ops. There is no Way to be certain that Juggernaught will be in. If thats the case, then Every weapon used in World at War on the Zombie Maps would Have to be in Black Ops, And they've already confirmed no Betties, so Your theory is busted.

Yeah, I called TWO Gamestops. And they Only Said Co-Op Maps. Not Zombies. But On BestBuy.com it Does Say, "Zombies Maps Made Famous by World at War"

Your Absolutely Correct. I apologize. I was SO Frustrated with all these people Reading the Words "Co-Op Maps" and somehow understanding it as "Zombie Maps" And in turn making 55 seperate threads about the same Damn thing. Its so dumb. This place is starting to look like the HQ with all the Duplicate Threads. In no way, shape, or form does Co-Op Maps = Zombies. But I guess Gamestop has been telling people that they're Zombie Maps. Both my Gamestops only said Co-Op so I don't know. And Your Correct Again, I was merely Assuming(and obviously you know what assuming does) That this would be like the Hundred other offers of this type, like Gears of War 2 for example. Where if you buy the Collectors Edition, you get a code or the maps/DLC, whereas if you don't buy the Collectors edition you actually have to purchase the maps/DLC. To ease your frustration about the Price, the Hardened Edition is only $80. Once again, I apologize.

Really? Really? No. Really. ONE:Its only $20 extra. TWO: You will still Get to play Whatever mode these maps are for, but if you don't Get the Hardened or Prestige Editions, and IF you WANT the Maps. You'll have to download them from the Marketplace, And they'll probably be cheap. . . Co-op mode in Black Ops has been confirmed for a long time to be a predecessor to NZ. Hopefully it's got zombies; I don't want to fight living Russians. THREE: This does not confirm Zombies. In any way shape or form. AND FOUR: Treyarch Already Stated they weren't doing anything like Spec Ops. And Predecessor means before. What is the Problem? :facepalm:

Sad? If the weather will be different on some maps, Everytime you play it. How is that sad? This would be the Coolest things ever! Everytime I play Seelow or Outskirts all I can think about is how awesome this map would be in the snow, or at night. If its true, then AWESOME! Oh, and By the way, Completely Wrong location for this. . .

That RC Car is actually probably Worth $200-$300 Alone. Thats Crazy. I am Very Disappointed with the fact that they Kept the Collector's Edition names from modern warfare 2. Just another thing that makes me worried Treyarch Won't be able to swim against the Current, Thus keeping everything like modern warfare 2. Seriously, Call it something Different. Like The Black Edition, or The S.O.G. Edition. Something. Anything.

I don't think there should be pro perks. Its makes the player way to powerful. If you have 3 pro-level perks, its pretty much like you have 6 perks equipped. Which is three too many. I understand why you want Sniper Rifles to do more damage, but honestly, in normal mode the only one shot kills should be a shotgun at very close range, or a headsot. If you want a Rifle to be a one hit Kill, play Hardcore mode. Other than that, I like your style.

Everyone Here Is either Mis-using or misunderstanding the term "Secondary". Treyarch Already said "No Secondary Weapons" Literally. Thats what they said. The Crossbow will take up a perk slot, like the Bazooka from World at War, or the rpg from Call of Duty 4. Thats why it only has Two Bolts, and look at how slow he switches to it. Slow like the switch to a Bazooka.

Lol, have you tried "drop-shotting" in real life? I haven't either, but they train Marines to NOT do it. Its a bad Idea. Your more liable to shoot yourself before the enemy. Its actually really dangerous. You drop to the ground, landing on your arm's/elbows that are holding your weapon. The force of your landing causes you to lose your grip on the weapon, and your weapon bounces off the ground, its simple physics. If your still pulling the trigger its bad. You have no control. Of course you'd hit the dirt, and thats understandable. I have no problem with that part of it. Its the shooting while falling and somehow magically keeping your aim dead accurate. Thats the problem. And while I understand your perspective on camping, But you think its ok when Literally Everyone in a match is sitting in corners or hiding an caves? Camping can be strategic, but 98% of the time its abused by camping cool guys who can't get a kill any other way. Its not just gamers who complain. Its the Human Race. People will find something to complain about. No matter what. Although More so from immature kids who die in a video game and think its unfair.