Zieghail

Yeah Hughes net and other Satellite Internet providers are mean guys. They give you your Bandwidth limit, and once you reach that then your screwed for at least 24 hours. They completely cut you off. Its really dumb. I assume you live in the middle of No where, Like Myself? If so, You should Check around and see if there are any wireless providers in your area. It wont be as fast but it will be fast enough, and it'll probably be cheaper than Hughes Net.

Yep. Its probably true. Its a little more prevelant than a little known fact though. Treyarch Hired a Seperate team, not an entirely seperate developer, to help with the DLC. Treyarch developers oversaw Every Little Detail, and had a hand in Designing the maps themselves. The Extra team hired on was mainly just for the leg work, the actual creation of the maps like coding and other things. So Don't freak out so much, the seperate team is pretty much part of Treyarch, and Treyarch will personally design the maps or whatever DLC they have in mind, just not actually create it.

Campaign First, Its tradition. Ever since Finest Hour on the Original Xbox. . . And I have to do something until my buddy In California gets it. California live's in the past and midnight Doesn't come to California until two hours after its here in Iowa. I Already have my Schedule planned out. 12:30 A.M. - 2:30 A.M. : Campaign on Veteran 2:30 A.M. - 8:30 A.M. : Multiplayer 8:30 A.M. - 9:00 A.M. : Breakfast/Shower/Decide whether or not to call in to work 9:00 A.M. - 8:00 A.M(the next day) : Multiplayer/Campaign. All Depending on whether or not Treyarch can Make another Game as great as World at War, and pull away from the mess that is modern warfare 2. And If thats the case, I think That will put me up for about 60 hours straight. . . Lets see if I can swing that again. . .

I play Hardcore Search and Destroy exclusively. And Unless they changed it since last I played, you still only get 100 points for a Bomb plant or Defuse in modern warfare 2, it may say 1000 while in game, but you really only get 100 xp in the end. Which is one of the reasons I quit playing modern warfare 2, Hardcore Search is ruined by all the stupid perks and killstreaks, and points, or lack there of. And thats beside this fact, I read an article in OXM recently and infinity ward purposely made it take longer to Rank Up in Search and Destroy. Statistically its true. And along with making some weapon attachments take 300 kills to unlock, infinity ward wanted to get enough people to quit playing Search and Destroy so they could remove it from the playlist. I know all that sounds completely ridiculous, and really, Whats the point? But I've never said anything more true in my entire life.

You see, Call of Duty 3 actually implemented the Idea of Perks before modern warfare did. In Call of Duty 3, you could revive your team mates, you could sprint, you could customize your class(sort of) and a few other things. Treyarch implemented a lot of things that infinity ward gets all the credit for.

:lol:

See. . . I haven't played this game since before Christmas. Its so horrible. One of the things that makes me the most angry is what they did to Search and Destroy. "Oh, Lets add a Zero to the end of everything you get points for. . . Except for Bomb Plants in Search and Destroy. We want to ruin the Search and Destroy game mode." - infinity ward Then they add all these dumb perks and weapons that make every game last for about 45 seconds, and on top of all that, they create their typical trash maps that were probably designed by a monkey and place the targets in horrible places. Then they Ruin Hardcore mode. . . Search and Destroy, along with hardcore mode need to go back to the way they are in World at War.

Also the FN-FAL, and the Five-seveN. FN Herstal is a great Weapons Developer. Thats one thing that always bugs me about modern warfare. Both the P90 and the F2000 are the Tactical models. The Factory Optic on the P90 is extremely cool. It has 2 lenses, and when looking through the sight, the Cross-Hair wont appear unless you have the two lenses completely parallel, helping ensure accuracy.

Agreed, Except that Second Chance in World at War was great. It made the game a lot more strategic. I guess all they need is a way to revive your team mates if they get shot and its not a mortal wound.

There are actually 3 teams that Treyarch has Split into for Black Ops. Campaign Multiplayer Co-op They also hired on an external studio completely dedicated to swinging the Ban-Hammer at modders, hackers, and all other forms of life with an increased lack of Integrity and morals. They are also suppose to keep the leader boards legitimate and usable. This is the whole studio by the way, All 200 some people, working on one game. When they were developing World at War, not only did they not have seperate teams dedicated to campaign, multiplayer, and co-op; They were also working on 2 other games at the same time. So with 3 times as many people working on Black Ops, that only means that it will be 3 times as good as World at War. And We all know that World at War was 150 times better than Modern Warfare 2, so when we do the math, that means Black Ops Will be roughly. . . 9,000,000 times better than modern warfare 2. . . Give or take.

Can't open the link because of the Internet Nazi's, But Its ridiculous to think that everything had been solved.

Controllable Killstreaks keep being mentioned. If there are controllable killstreaks Black Ops will turn out just like modern warfare 2. Its literally that simple. No Controllable Killstreaks, no matter what game mode it is. Sure it might be cool in Zombies, but it would take a lot of the intensity out if you get something that powerful out of the mystery box. Otherwise most of this stuff sounds like it would be fun. I don't know about Breaking from a Huddle during the opening moments of a round, Its not a game of Football after all. But I get the Idea, and something other than just standing and waiting in the opening moments would be cool.

:lol: LOL! No offense, But "My ACR Owns!" . . . Really?. . . Of Course the ACR Owns, It has absolutely NO Recoil. . . Then again, no weapon in modern warfare does. . . But I do agree, the F2000 Rocks. You should Shoot one in Real Life. Its Just about the coolest thing ever, way better than the video game(it actually has recoil in real life ). One of my Favorite Weapons to shoot, next to the P90, and They are manufactured by the same company.

Nope, It won't exist for another 30 years. If it is an M16 its Probably an A1 like play said. It could be an AR-15 or The C(ommando)AR-15 seen in other videos. Considering they're all more or less the Same weapon. Can't watch the Video because of the internet Nazi's! :x

The concept still applies. When you start making different Kinds of Zombies, the game becomes something else. Different Kinds of Zombies, be them Bosses/super soldiers, would make the game no different then Resident Evil or Left 4 Dead. And thats what is so great about Treyarch's Zombies, its not Resident Evil or Left 4 Dead. Its simple, pure, survival.

I disagree. FPS games are not the place for boss fights. Boss Fights belong in other genre's and games Like Devil May Cry or Final Fantasy. Boss fights in Zombies would especially distract from the simple "Pure Survival" feeling that Nazi Zombies gives you. And thats the greatest thing about Zombies. You dont really know whats going on, there is a little mystery but its not in your face, and your just trying to survive. Its not convoluted with Boss fights. While I understand Zombies might need something fresh and new, I don't think Boss Fights are the Answer.

There is no patch. They say its a "patch" or "fix", but it isn't. There is nothing infinity ward can do. They set the foundation for all of this, and the players caught on and ruined the game even more.

Thats something I haven't thought of. Keeping Pro Perks, but they would essentially be a seperate perk that would have to be used alone.

I hope it works out like they think it will, but I can very easily see it backfiring. As long as killstreaks run through 15, people will camp for them. As long as killstreaks are controllable, people will camp for them. As long as killstreaks are more powerful than an artillery strike or AI controlled helicopter, people will camp for them. And when the killstreaks they camp for no longer acquire their other, higher, killstreaks, people will camp that much Harder for the higher killstreaks. The only way to stop killstreak camping is to return to the 3-5-7 killstreak set up, and return killstreaks to their former "power", no killstreak should be more powerful than an AI controlled helicopter or Dogs.

^^^ Thats funny, because I have an Issue of OXM and there's an article Where Bowling and other lead developers of modern warfare 2 describe their top ten strategies. The developers themselves use such strategies like: marathon + commando, Riot Shield + commando, noob-tubes + danger close/one man army, spamming stun grenades, Akimbo 1882's (this magazine issue was before they "fixed" the 1882). Its no wonder 99% of everyone who plays this game plays the way they do considering the people who created the game play that way.

Reznov wasn't that old In World at War, and its only 20 years later. Besides, they've already confirmed that it is THE Very same Reznov voiced by Gary Oldman.

@ Angel: Some good Ideas, especially the 3-5-7 killstreaks. But pro perks shouldn't exist. Pro perks esssentially give the player six perks instead of three. Which is way to many and makes the player very overpowered. No unlimited sprint or thermal anything. Marathon/unlimited sprinting ruined the pace of every game mode except Team deathmatch. Especially Search and Destroy.

GASP! CoDz Achievements!? I heart Achievements! The store sounds like a great Idea as Well.

^^^ Agreed, and in shorter terms: Pretty much Just go back to before modern warfare 2.

^^^ LOL! I was just about to say the same thing. . . And While modern warfare 1 was better than modern warfare 2. World at War is better than both.