ZombieOfTheDead

@LJx19 Ya, I wasn't really sure how to interpret that, so thanks for clearing that up. As for reasons, I'm pretty sure the biggest one is bridging that gap that you mentioned, which makes sense. If they find a way to make it GOOD (and now that I think about it, there are several ways without taking out the EE) I will be... semi for it. I don't think there's a whole lot of reason, because frankly it would be more replayable to just make more maps instead. Asking me to be open minded... Okay, well I'm going to stop the arguing guys. Hopefully we'll get a confirmation on whether or not it's real soon. That's what I really hate, people who think it's 100% true without treyarch's confirmation. @ballbearing32 You, sir, are a genius. That is a way I think it could work. Origin stories in addition would be fantastic for our heroes, and the rest sounds pretty great. I'm open for filling in the gaps, just not the entire new part of the story.

They were playing while the zombie info was going on, weren't they? Or a little bit afterwards maybe. That's mainly why we think of it that way.

Dude, I love stories, don't get me wrong, but in zombies it's different. I love how you have to find the story, instead of the typical way the campaign is. And oh my god, I actually thought of a great idea for the campaign. What the crew went through before zombies.

Oh, well that would be somewhat interesting. I suspect, however, that 8 players is only for the competitive game mode they've discussed (4v4). Like, I won't really care so much, as long as the story with the main crew is primarily how it is currently, but if it did something sorta like this I wouldn't mind so much, because the story continues with other maps. Now that I think about it, if campaign bridged the gap between zombie maps, it could be potentially interesting as well.

All I'm seeing is just more negativity. If having "confirmed zombie campaign" said to you makes your balls recede into your stomach and your ears bleed then maybe you should just give up hope on call of duty sir. Hypocrite... Seriously, you're using something that was used against you against me. Apparently you're just as negative, so don't go on like that. At the very least I was going to STOP posting, but you just drew me back in. Thanks. People ALWAYS seem to do this. I asked people something, then you bring upon more negativity. Now, lets end this. At the very least I am being negative on something that could possibly really suck, or not be how everyone wanted it to be. Now, please, could someone explain to me why Zombie Campaign is a good idea in a polite manor, and I will be polite in return.

Okay, you know what, since I'm not getting anywhere with you people, I'm going to ask you guys: Why the hell do you want a zombie campaign? With 3arc having to do normal campaign, multiplayer, and normal zombies all at the same time, I can tell you it is extremely unlikely that they would do a zombie campaign as well. Video games aren't exactly easy to make. It could end up being terribly done. It might end up like a CoD campaign, a one time thing regardless of if you have Co-op or not. Could end up like L4D. Terrible, IMO. I want to find out the story, but not like this. I just don't see campaign happening. I'm going to end it like this. Give me an actual good reason for there to be a zombie campaign, other than the fact that it progresses the zombie story, and maybe I'll be open minded. Actually, no I won't. I'm too stubborn as many of you know. But maybe I'll actually respect your opinions more, because right now I really just don't get it.

You missed the point, bro. I want to play as Dempsey & Co in survival, and have EE (both big, and radio messages). If they just did basically what they have now for zombies, but made it progressive (like to another map), then why couldn't they have just made those into maps with no progression through levels? It would pretty much be different in the campaign aspect. I already gave you my reasons for why survival won't really be the same above. Gameplay may not change, but there are other aspects out there. I also don't get why some people want campaign so much. Makes things kinda one dimensional, especially in a CoD game.

With 4 player co-op? I think it'll have replay value. Ever play CoD WaW's co-op campaign? Ya, maybe every once in awhile, but it's not going to be like normal zombies.

Because it could turn out to be dull, boring, only a one time play type of thing. Basically gets rid of EEs that we all know and love. Could end up like L4D, which I mostly hated gameplay wise. You know, if it played out like resident evil, not a CoD game, I think it would be pretty awesome. But otherwise, it just doesn't sound fun to me. It really doesn't have anything amazing. Oh, and we could potentially lose out on our favorite zombie slayers for regular survival. That would honestly kinda suck.

Mmmm well, it's a start. Granted I think he could have missed the part about that, or couldn't outright say anything, but maybe that's just because I don't want it to happen. Still, I'm not going to outright say that it's confirmed, because after all, this is only one guy. Also, treyarch generally doesn't confirm or deny things unless it has to do with copyright issues like the Iron Wolf thing awhile back.

He's dull at times, but I never understood how people thought he was annoying. The stereotypical asian accent just gets me sometimes "Takeo can FRY!" He's not really dull now that I think about... maybe back with SNN and Der Riese, but really not anymore. At the very least, I always thought he looked cool. Needs his awesome hat back.

Then maybe you should link the tweet instead of us having to take your word for it? I am not believing it unless treyarch just straight out says something.

My point was more that they wouldn't do it without changing the core of zombies (Gameplay and EE). They would need to do a story with an entirely different cast of characters to do this campaign, because most of us want to stick with our old classic zombie slayers in the same form as they are currently. The biggest thing is they would get rid of EE if they had a campaign, so in a sense they can't really have it that way. There was also the thought of EE progressing the story, but then that sounds exactly like regular zombies, making campaign 100% pointless as it is. It COULD happen, but I think it's extremely unlikely. What I'm saying is, it's still survival based which means it WILL be exactly the same if it has EE, because if it wasn't it would be basically a L4D campaign. I honestly doubt they even have the time to do a full second campaign. Big changes are not always good, my friend, I will not suck it up because it's probably not even going to happen.

We already know this one, dude. He's a playable character in the part of the game taking place in the 80's

Uh, nope. Did treyarch say anything in there? Nope. Therefore it is not "confirmed." We also already have a thread on this here

What's the point of that then, if it's the EXACT same, but you just move on. Screw that, I'd rather just have one continuous map, and then once you die the game is over. The story just continues through maps like it always has. That's way more fun IMO.

What... what's so bad about cutscenes? I never actually understood that part. Another thing, if it's ANYTHING like the CoD campaign, it's pretty much a one time play thing, so if there was it wouldn't in that forum. I don't see any other way to get about it, except for the L4D route (which sucks), or surviving one area and then moving on, which I don't think quite works either, but that's just me. They'd have to make basically an entirely different story for campaign then, like some of us are saying about a different group.

Looks more like a Nova Crawler than anything else.

Living proof from a guy that doesn't work with treyarch? I think not. Don't call people dumb. It's still relatively unlikely. Remember, it's not just gameplay. Some people like finding the story. We wouldn't have this site if it wasn't for that. I highly doubt they would simply get rid of that and have the campaign.

It can not, and WILL not happen. Didn't treyarch confirm it wouldn't happen, that they didn't want to take away from the core gameplay? Well, that would take it away. If it did happen, it would take away the fun of EEs as well. At the very least, change the title of the thread so if doesn't sound confirmed. Misleading title is misleading.

Aw man, not you again... I'm only kidding, welcome back. ;)

It's pretty much the reason Sam never tried to take over the world. She only wants to send 935 and their connections into oblivion. Hence why CotD and Five they attack us. I'm still confused about Nacht and Verruckt in this case, though.

We don't know it's Samantha 100%. Just sayin. But I think that is what the next map will be about. It wouldn't be with spirit, I don't think (although if that is the case, would richtofen turn into a little boy? That'd be interesting to see ).

I'm waiting to see how someone survived the explosion... My guess is still that the chick could potentially be Samantha in a less creepy body.

Could this possibly mean Zombie killstreaks! No... first off, how would that work as a killstreak? Maybe a trap-like thing where you buy it, but killstreaks would never work. I just hope all zombie maps aren't as destroyed as this. Still, looks beastly.