MysteryMachineX

I offer my support. Although I must admit that web hosting is something I know nothing about. But if there is another way I can help, let me know.

I was going to make a video showing the guns and ranking them. However, the data turned out to be flimsy enough, so much so, to the point that I didn't feel it ethical to push it on other people. It is still the data I use to judge the weapons for myself, personally. But I cannot say without a doubt that they are right, which pretty much defeats the point. I am still making the weapon video. However, the ranking is no longer a part of it. I could give you the ranking separately if you would like me to post it.

It isn't a separate robot. It is just an inconsistency with the foot pattern. If it was a robot, it'd come back. If it was a robot, it'd have bumped into the robots on the intersecting paths. It was just there for the cutscene to introduce the idea of the robot, and then you have the gameplay which has the robots walking around. The fact the paths don't exactly line up is just an inconsistency, like Nikolai having the Olympia.

Just wanted to comment after reading this. As you know might expect, I don't agree. The children own certain things not detailed in the comic book. So that assumes there is more than we see to the comic book. So whether I believe your theory or a certain other one (such as my own), I am forced to make an assumption. Why should I make yours when I can make mine? (Rhetorical). In the end, I choose to not make that assumption, so that I can conclude that the ending is in WWII time, so that I can choose the cyclical theory, that all is real. I don't mean to challenge you on your thread, but I thought a comment that wasn't in full agreement might be better than saying nothing at all. It actually is the best "it's just a game" theory I've heard, in your defense.

No no no no no no. We were supposed to have a year before the next game came out! D: :? :cry: :| :geek: (mixed emotions)

There might be a mathematical barrier. Like, it may be physically be impossible to get it at too early a Round because there simply aren't enough spots to dig.

Sorry, but I don't see that as a current possibility with what we have now. That could possibly be true if Treyarch put something that indicated that, but from what we know Samantha was at one point a German little girl, child of Dr. Maxis in the '40's. That much is pretty much rock-solid. The only way she could ever be in medieval times is as something other than her true human little girl self, such as a deity, ethereal being, or Richtofen. But, we have no record of her even being around anytime earlier than 1918.

Electric, please try to stay on topic. If you want to pretentiously try to control people, do it by PMs. Thank you.

Well done Grill. Although I think Infest's point still has merit (incorrect merit, that is). Regardless of the accuracy of the statements about Origins, the statements are still made. You and I know them not be true, but not everyone sees that (unfortunately). And that may have drawn them away. On the contrary, though, I must also admit that idea threads were never really consistent with any sort of pattern. Btw, Grill, remember the placement of the statues. The staffs' positions are right in front of them, in front of the swords. The statue may carry a sword, but the pedestal in front of the statue symbolizes what their "sword" is, a staff. Now the pedestals we see are just replicas, but in all likelihood the sentiment could hold true for the originals that were once there.

Is this really what mmx was trying to say... that has nothing to do with virtual necrophilia... necrophilia involves dead corpses. An enemy is downed not dead. Be more clear next time mmx. And i never 'tea bag' I might furiously click the crouch button but i do it more of in a dancing way. Virtual necrophilia. I consider that a general life rule, not just in a game of Zombies.... I suppose you're right, especially since it has only been adopted by the immature players who shift from Multiplayer to Zombies when they're bored. It isn't native to Zombies itself.

I wrote the aggressive Grief guide. viewtopic.php?f=137&t=27651 There is a difference between griefing and just being a total butt hole. Your kind of players are the ones I aim to squish in my Grief games. Crouching on your opponent is not only NOT helpful to winning but it actually puts you in a risky situation. I've killed many a necrophiliac such as yourself.

Well I have to admit I was wrong. Sorry. I suppose it does exist, just the classification was wrong. It was a glitch, not a persistent upgrade. I don't approve of glitches either, but I suppose knowledge is knowledge. Good job to you zombie hunter. Good work.

I disagree Thou only rule in grief and turned is there thou no rules. (there are no rules in grief/turned) That is bad sportsmanship. It is a terrible way to play. You must be popular.

You might want to familiar yourself with the Ray Gun's rate of fire, for such a thing does not exist, as the blue guys above me have pointed out.

Thou shall not practice virtual necrophilia on thine Grief opponents.

Not to be a hater, but given how poorly made this game is (bugs and continuous errors), and given Treyarch's track record. Tbh, it's probably a bug. Not hating, just facing the reality of Treyarch's ways... You try making an entire immersive level in two months. They have fewer bugs than many other AAA titles.

Yeah, in all honesty, the next zombies game could literally be anything. I bet it will be a new timeline entirely, and therefore, it could be any time within that timeline.

Kino's date comes from the Fernsehturm outside. Incorrect. Kino -> Later 1968-Early 1969. Ascension/"Five" -> November 7, 1963. 1968/9 -> 1963 Time travel.

Kino takes place in late 1968 to early 1969. You are correct, Electric.

It is nice to see the proactive attitude. Despite the unfortunate down-time, it is good to see the "pick yourself back up" attitude. Let us hope that words turn into actions.

Here is my opinion on the whole door thing: Rule X: Thou who hast capitalized the greatest shall not be punished for doing so in the form of being coerced into purchasing group necessities on all his own. Expenditures shall be divided equally not based on the income of each of thou. Corollary 1: Thou who is privileged, be it by luck or skill, to have capitalized the greatest, should pity those less fortunate than he and be willing to pay for extra expenditures to help his fellow man when the opportunity is present or convenient, not because thou was forced by some written rule but because of thy kindness.

I will donate and will try my best to play a game of zombies with you, carbonfibah. It would be an honor, should that happen.

No problem. I think it really stems from my childhood where I wished the imaginative universes of which I played were real. So I would try to imagine them as being real, not really fantasy. Just wait until science proves the existence of something even rarer than the Higgs-Boson. The pyronion! :lol:

Could we please have the forums re-structured around the same time? The current structure is very inefficient.

You can take a break, assuming it is solo, where 95% of high-round suicides occur. Just pause and take a break to continue your high round record later. I have no sympathy if someone isn't willing to do that. If it is on co-op, there's a bit of leeway, but I still won't feel sorry for someone that loses their record the next month because they suicided when they could have gone farther.